TheGunMag – The Official Gun Magazine of the Second Amendment Foundation
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
    • COLUMNISTS

Hindsight: Feds, state officials abuse police powers to push policies

Posted By TheGunMag On Friday, December 30, 2011 09:05 PM. Under Hindsight  

Feds, state officials abuse police powers to push policies 

Federal and state law enforcement officials seem to be abusing their police powers and manipulating the media in order to revise an old anti-gun legislative agenda.

I don’t know if Niccolo Machiavelli, the early 16th century Italian historian considered the father of modern political science, would be impressed.

But he should be, because officials in the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the New York State Attorney General’s office have opened new avenues to control gun owners.

At the federal level, it appears that new evidence may confirm what many observers have suspect for a long time:  that Obama administration officials were plotting to use the consequences of flawed Operation Fast and Furious to further a gun-control agenda.

Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News  reported on Dec. 7 that the emails show  agents from the Bureau of Alcohol,  Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives  (ATF) discussing how they would use  Fast and Furious to “argue for controversial  new rules about gun sales.”  “ATF officials didn’t intend to  publicly disclose their own role in  letting Mexican cartels obtain the  weapons, but emails show they discussed  using the sales, including sales  encouraged by ATF, to justify a new  gun regulation called ‘Demand Letter  3,’ ” Attkisson reported. “That would require some US gun shops to report the sale of multiple rifles or ‘long guns.’  Demand Letter 3 was so named because it would be the third ATF program demanding gun dealers report tracing information.”  First came the questionable government claim to support new gun control laws that 90% of the guns fueling the drug wars in Mexico came from US retail outlets. While this was being disputed, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, along with the DOJ, were actually encouraging mass retail sales to possible traffickers and paid informers.

But they lost track of the guns they claimed they were tracing, and worse yet, they never informed the Mexican authorities so they could try and track the guns on their side of the border.

Meanwhile, the US was selling weapons to Mexico under another program called “direct commercial sales” for military and law enforcement use. Even though the Mexican military  recently reported nearly 9,000 police  weapons “missing,” the US has approved  the sale of more guns to Mexico  in recent years than ever before,  according to CBS News.

It looks more and more that by creating a problem the anti-gunners can propose and enact a legislative solution.

The same stratagem seems to be in vogue in New York Attorney General  Eric Schneiderman’s office.

Schneiderman, a notoriously anti-gun state senator before he became AG, in early December issued press releases about an undercover “sting” investigation of gun shows that had been ongoing since May 2011.

Schniederman’s probe involved undercover investigators making buys without background checks at gun shows, as required under New York law. That led first to charges against 10 people selling guns at various shows around the state.

The way the press releases were written, the print and electronic media reported it as the arrest of 10 New York gun dealers for illegal guns sales.

The only problem is that the 10 who were charged were not dealers, but individuals making private sales, even after they were advised by the “sting” agents that they probably could not  pass a background check.

Schneiderman’s press release made it plain that it was not the guns or even the private sales that was his concern but the gun show promoters.

Needless to say, no one waited long before Schneiderman got together with the state’s junior senator, Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat like the AG,  to announce that she was filing new  federal legislation “to crack down on  corrupt gun dealers and eliminate  the steady flow of illegal guns into  New York.”  Of course, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg of earlier “sting” infamy and the Brady Campaign were holding the  coats of Gillibrand and Schneiderman.

Gillibrand’s forthcoming bill will be captioned the “Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2011.” It hadn’t been filed  yet as this issue of TheGunMag.com  went to press, but the DC press  conference made it clear that it is  aimed at preventing any private sales  without a background check, and  possible closing down most gun shows  under an expensive paperwork and  legal burden.

You’ll soon be reading and hearing more about these new efforts to resurrect some old gun show legislation that has been kicking around Washington, DC, and Albany for years without being passed. Gun shows, and private sales of all kinds at flea markets, shooting matches, or anywhere else have always been a prime concern of the anti-gun community.

I have always contended that what they are most concerned about is the social interaction at guns shows. The shows offer an opportunity for the grassroots activists to get informed and to mobilize against new gun restrictions  just such as those that Gillibrand and Scheiderman are now proposing.

If you need further proof that the  New York “sting” at least was not  intended to prosecute wrongdoing,  listen to this.

The 10 individuals recently charged in New York have already been released in contemplation of dismissal if  they stay out of trouble of any kind for  the next six months. Some consider that no more than a slap on the wrist.

However, TheGunMag.com has been informed that the individual gun show promoters involved have been served with papers demanding records of all the background checks conducted at their shows for the past three years.

This story will be continued. The lawyers will be busy and the gun show promoters will be wondering if they want to continue mounting shows with all the NICS warnings and security that they have had for years with the attendant higher cost of more legal counsel.

Whether Gillibrand’s bill can pass in the current Congress remains to be seen, but surely it is clear that the perseverance of the anti-gunners is unlimited.

 

← California’s ‘assault weapon’ ban challenged in federal court
Reader Forum →
  • Useful Gun Owner Links
    • Armed American Radio
    • Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)
    • Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership (DRGO)
    • International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights (IAPCAR)
    • Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
    • Keep And Bear Arms (KABA)
    • Polite Society Podcast
    • Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)
    • Tom Gresham's Gun Talk
    • US Concealed Carry Association
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ARCHIVES
  • ABOUT US
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved.