TheGunMag – The Official Gun Magazine of the Second Amendment Foundation
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
    • COLUMNISTS

Unconstitutional: Federal Judge Strikes Down Post Office Carry Ban

Posted By Dave Workman On Wednesday, October 1, 2025 05:05 AM. Under Featured  
A federal judge in Texas has ruled that the U.S. Post Office prohibition on firearms is unconstitutional in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition. (Dave Workman)

By Dave Workman

Editor-in-Chief

A federal judge in Texas who was appointed by President Donald Trump has struck down the ban on firearms carried in U.S. Post Offices, declaring the prohibition unconstitutional.

Judge Reed O’Connor with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, wrote in his three-page opinion, the federal statute “is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment with respect to Plaintiffs’ (and their members) possession and carrying of firearms inside of an ordinary United States Post Office or the surrounding Post Office property. An ordinary United States Post Office is defined as a United States Post Office that is not located inside of (1) a Military Base or similarly restricted access area, or (2) a Federally owned or leased building housing government functions other than a United States Post Office in which carrying a firearm would otherwise be prohibited.”

According to the Washington Times, O’Connor’s ruling says the gun ban “cannot survive scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in the Bruen case. That ruling said that for firearms restrictions to stand, they must be consistent with what the founders who crafted the Second Amendment would have envisioned.”

In the founding era, there was no ban on firearms in post offices, the newspaper noted.

Cheering the decision was the Second Amendment Foundation, which brought the case along with the Firearms Policy Coalition and two private citizens.

“This is a huge win for SAF and its members,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb. “There is no historical analogue to justify a ban on carrying a firearm on postal property, and we are pleased the court rightly saw through this thinly veiled attempt at preventing citizens from fully exercising their constitutional rights.”

“Millions of people across the country visit the U.S. Post Office as part of their daily routine,” SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut observed. “As we’ve stated throughout this case, there is no historical tradition of banning firearms at post offices, and peaceable Americans all over the country should not be forced to choose between using basic postal services and the exercise of their fundamental rights. Today’s ruling is an encouraging step towards restoring these rights.”

“As we’ve said all along, governments cannot ban weapons in unsecured public spaces, full stop,” said FPC President Brandon Combs in a statement to the media. “For too long, peaceable people have been threatened with prosecution simply for carrying weapons for self-defense while mailing a package or buying stamps. That ends here. The Second Amendment simply does not permit governments to invent new so-called ‘gun-free zones’ wherever they please.”

← Grassroots Judicial Report—October 1, 2025
Federal Judge Dismisses Lawsuit v. Century Arms →
  • Useful Gun Owner Links
    • Armed American Radio
    • Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)
    • Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership (DRGO)
    • International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights (IAPCAR)
    • Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
    • Keep And Bear Arms (KABA)
    • Polite Society Podcast
    • Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)
    • Tom Gresham's Gun Talk
    • US Concealed Carry Association
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ARCHIVES
  • ABOUT US
Copyright © 2025. All Rights Reserved.